Posted on Sep 29, 2008 04:58:07 PM | Steven Gonzalez | 30 Comments
-
Fifty years later and it is amazing how many still long for another space race. The logic goes something like this, "If we had another Space Race then the public and therefore congress would fully fund American Space Exploration." As you can imagine there are many strong opinions about the validity of that logic, but at the AAS 2007 national conference titled "Celebrating Fifty Years - But, What's Next?" I recently heard two opinions that greatly resonated with me. The first was that the initial Space Race must be couched in the context of that time and the global context of today is very different. The second was from the collaborative, social networking culture of Generation Y and their desire to see a global effort to expand our presence in Space. As the speaker shared the Generation Y opinions of the future, what came to mind were the beginnings of "The Federation" for all of you Star Trek fans.
But not only is the context different today and the perspectives of the next Generation very different from 50 years ago, the International Space community is much more than just two super powers. In the World Prospects for Government Space Markets Report available from Euroconsult, an in-depth analysis on government civil and military space is captured for the 35 leading countries and organizations, along with insights into the 48 emerging national programs. The first time I saw the below chart I was surprised by some of the emerging programs. Although not shown here, the report also highlights Mexico's plans to create a Mexican Space Agency, or AEXA, for short.
Yes, all of these nations are not involved in the Human Exploration of Space but the number is greater than 2 and growing. Secondly this chart makes the point that space competencies are being found in an ever expanding global community. This growth is being fueled not just by national pride but also by a growing realization that innovation leads to national wealth and attracts more business. For some great insight into this, I would recommend Innovation Nation by John Kao. (More on Innovation in a future blog.) Or for a shorter read, look at the Road map drafted between Russia and the European Union that highlights space as an area of focus for economic growth, Road Map For The Common Economic Space - Building Blocks For Sustained Economic Growth. OK, so what about Space Exploration? I think that JAXA captures it best in their video presentation of their JAXA Vision - JAXA 2025. In the video it shows a moon populated with bases from multiple nations. Currently Russia, (Russia to send manned mission to the Moon by 2025), China (China Plans to Land on Moon By 2024), India, (Indian scientists support human space mission) and Japan are planning human missions to the moon. When those countries arrive they will find other vehicles in the space around the moon and on the lunar surface. Last year "British space scientists said they plan to undertake the country's first mission to the moon by the end of the decade. Germany also plans an unmanned flight to the moon by 2013. Beside Germany and UK, China, Japan, India and Italy have similar plans." (see Russia Plans To Go On the Moon). So with all of these countries heading out beyond Low Earth Orbit can you truly call it a race? Or will the better measure of success be who has the greatest staying power? Which nation, once they land on the lunar surface, will establish a lasting presence on the moon? Or better yet, who will partner with whom to reach to the moon and beyond?
For me, one of the most interesting aspects of the future of space exploration is the partnerships that are being created for this "New Space Age". Russia is partnering with ESA to create the Clipper Spacecraft. Russia and India are joining in a moon mission and China is partnering with Nigeria and Venezuela. Earlier this year it was announced that NASA and India have signed an agreement for future cooperation. Yet, more intriguing than the new collaborations is who isn't included in the team. The original 2 space faring nations are not always included in the teaming arrangements.
Adding this to the changing environment in commercial space that I shared last time makes me believe that the next 20 years will be quite different from the past 50. It offers a great deal of opportunity for NASA and a challenge. The opportunity lies in the potential partnerships that we can leverage and the growing expertise that we can tap into globally. The challenge is to decide if this future environment will necessitate a new or more focused role for JSC and the other NASA centers. Therefore, the question I leave for you this week is whether our role (or if you prefer, the unique value we offer) should change in the future and if so what should it be?
Sharing the Vision -
Steven Gonzalez, Deputy, Advanced Planning Office
Tags : International
30 comments so far ( Post your own )
- 30
On Feb 01, 2010 03:05:34 PM
guest
wrote:
I think the future of space lays in the hands of a future partnership with another organization.
Michael Mesa Miami- 29 On Jan 11, 2010 12:02:48 AM guest wrote:
Congratulations for this interesting featured picture! A whole new world...! |
USA Online Shopping Mall |
Social Bookmark Dofollow |
Best Article |
Best Article |
Dofollow Bookmark |- 28 On Jan 08, 2010 02:00:51 PM Jenny wrote:
"The point is, we are building the Future of Space. Stop thinking in the short term and start thinking in 100 year increments. A Consortium of nations on the Moon is just the beginning. Let's build the United Earth Space Agency. The US can have an important role but we are just one nation among many. Share the knowledge, the excitement, and the wealth, and get out there! Space belongs to no one and to all, so why should only a few nations have a moon base or travel to other planets? Let's do it together as Humanity."
I totally agree! Bookmark Credit Cards - 29 On Jan 11, 2010 12:02:48 AM guest wrote:
Comment notes
Keep comments relevant. Inappropriate or offensive comments may be edited and/or deleted. Avoid adding Web site urls.
Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use
<p>or<br/>. Quotes, apostrophes, and double-dashes are automatically converted to smart punctuation. Be careful when copying and pasting portions of entries or other comments.